Centre for Human Security and International Affairs

Driven by the values of commitment, professionalism, excellence, and collaboration.

Exploring ideas. Illuminating issues. Inspiring dialogue.

The Centre for Human Security and International Affairs (CHSIA), is a not-for-profit, non-partisan, independent body committed to open-minded objective research and policy relevant studies on all aspects of human security and international affairs.

We strive to enable policy-driven analysis, where emerging scholars develop critical thinking and global insight to craft effective responses to the world’s most pressing challenges in human security and international affairs.

Our Latest Publications

Beyond The Protests: As Nepal Acts Politically, Its People Suffer Silently

Priya Paul and Mayilvaganan M analyze the 2025 Gen Z protests in Nepal, arguing that political solutions alone cannot resolve the nation’s deep social crisis. They highlight how economic insecurity, youth unemployment, and inadequate healthcare exacerbate anxiety and despair. The authors assert that sustainable peace and stability require a comprehensive approach that includes socio-economic development, mental health awareness, and community-based care.

Qatar at a Crossroads: Redefining Security Beyond U.S. Guarantees

Mayilvaganan M examines Qatar’s emergency summit in Doha on September 15, 2025, brought together leaders from the Gulf Cooperation Council, the Arab League, and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation in a rare display of regional solidarity. The analysis highlights growing doubts over Washington’s deterrence strategy, which many in the region now see as faltering. By stepping in to convene Arab and Muslim leaders, does Doha signal that the Gulf states can no longer rely solely on U.S. backing to contain future threats—particularly those posed by Israel.

Why Trump Wanted Greenland: An Inquiry into U.S. Strategy

Saira Grace Saju analyzes the strategic rationale behind President Donald Trump’s proposal to purchase Greenland and how U.S. Doctrine’s blend of transactionalism, military positioning, and resource ambition reflects a broader strategy aimed at expanding American influence in the Arctic region, highlights the tension between national interests and local sovereignty.